Sunday 28 October 2012

007 - Skyfall



After a brush with friendly fire and atomic bullets, an injured, despondent Bond retires to an exotic beach to sleep around and court danger. Neither seems to make him happy. He's numb, unable to create any joy for himself. It's a brief window into Bond's thoroughly miserable downtime. He's rootless and restless by design. 007 lives to work. He's a company man through and through. Take that away from him and he's just a loose jumble of self-destructive drives searching for purpose. He needs direction. He wants a parent, basically. Skyfall explicitly noodles around with the idea of Bond as a lost, damaged little boy seeking approval. It's a reading that Ian Fleming frequently stressed in Bond's relationship with his taskmaster M. Bond wanting to please the only authority in his life that he respects. 

It's an idea that hasn't been particularly well mined in any of the previous films. The various M characters are typically defined as anonymous, interchangeable, desk jockeys; fit to issue orders and not much else. Here though, there's history. M's importance to Bond is a central conceit, underpinning the spy's war with a shade, an earlier agent that didn't quite measure up to the MI6 taskmaster's impossibly high standards. Raoul Silva is a discarded child. GoldenEye introduced Judi Dench's M as a kind of joke - could an irredeemable misogynist handle taking life-and-death orders from a tiny middle-aged woman? That was 17 years ago. In the interim this M has transformed from Bond's idea of a meddling accountant into a dispassionate iron lady entirely comfortable with feeding her agents into the meat grinder. Naturally, he adores her. She demands complete sacrifice in pursuit of results, something Bond willingly gives. 

M allows Bond to test his limits and abilities in pursuit of something he trusts is worthwhile. He almost wants to die, and lacking any workable value system of his own, defers agency to her. Mother knows best. Silva, M's other child in Skyfall, although superficially similar, thinks too much. In an aside M reveals the fallen agent outlived his usefulness when he began to make his own moves, gathering his own intelligence. He sought to impress his master with ingenuity and external action. It got him deformed and stricken off. Conversely, Bond wins his girl's heart by retreating into himself, forcing everyone else to contend with a physical manifestation of his own internal dilemmas. Skyfall doesn't play the blockbuster game. It doesn't attempt to top the last multi-vehicle pile-up. Instead the action contracts, getting smaller and tenser, until you arrive at a man prowling an abandoned space - his cold, childhood home - protecting that which he has made his own.

5 comments:

mrbenn said...

I wanted to wait until I saw it before posting on your article Ready! I saw it last night, and after thinking about it today, I'm still not quite sure on my take of it...

Goldeneye was the first Bond film I had seen in the cinema and I got a huge kick out of seeing it. It wasn't until seeing Casino Royale that I would get the same buzz again. I really liked the different portrayal of Bond, and I think this was mostly due to Craig's performance.

The problem I have is that after seeing these "new bond actor" films, the expectations are raised, then ultimately dashed. Tomorrow Never Dies, was okay, but it really went downhill after that.

Then Casino Royale came out. In my view, Bond was cool again, but all it took was Quantum to bring him down to just mediocre.

Then Skyfall is released and already people refer to it as a "classic bond" film. But with so many different bond films to compare it to, I'm not really sure understand that statement. Sure, I saw the nods to the old films in there, but the representation of Bond is different with each actor/script/director.

Ultimately, I guess it comes down to the individual. There will be no "true" bond, because everyone's opinion is different, so no matter what you do with the bond license, some people will like it, some won't.

I really did enjoy Skyfall, but perhaps I need to dive into Ian Fleming's novels to find out who Bond really is.

Chris Ready said...

The books are great, I had a lot of fun reading through them all. Book Bond changes subtly with each novel - the full run of Fleming books map a career from a capable killer surviving incredible situations to a burnt out, introspective fuck up.

Have you seen any of the earlier films? My favourite Bonds are the early Terence Young ones with Connery, that's Dr No, From Russia With Love, and Thunderball. They're each pretty straight adaptations of the books but with some light sexing up for the screen.

The closest the films got to Fleming's spy was probably On Her Majesty's Secret Service, another fav of mine. Lazenby is physically adept but vulnerable, able to fall in love. I think a lot of what people dug about Casino Royale is in On Her Majesty's. They're the films I think of in terms of 'classic Bond'.

The way I see it, the Roger Moore films are fun, but basically cartoons. Dalton deserved better movies, and Brosnan peaked with GoldenEye (although The World is Not Enough has its moments), which I do really like. I've enjoyed all Craig's films so far.

mrbenn said...

I did see the earlier ones, but never got into them as much as I did with Goldeneye.

Interesting about OHMSS...I was always "told" that was the worst one!

I think I need to do an Alan Partridge style "bond-a-thon" one bank holiday weekend!

Really dug the original post though dude, and excited about the concept of you going through the other films/tv!

mrbenn

Chris Ready said...

OHMSS gets a bad rap. It's not perfect like. There's a sub-plot about Bond pretending to be an asexual academic that drags on forever, and a few lame jokes referencing the Connery flicks, but apart from that it's excellent.

Telly Savalas is boss as Blofeld, Diana Rigg is an equal for Bond, and Lazenby can really start some shit. Nice one for the encouragement!

Dan O. said...

Nice review Chris. I had a great time with this movie but I didn’t fall in love with it as much as I have with the older ones and Casino Royale as well. Still, a great Bond movie that has me excited for what’s to come next for Bond.